Howard Dean, the new Democratic National Chairman, inspires grassroots support and brings new people into the democratic process. He has been innovative in the use of technology, raising money, and political organization -- all vital parts of the DNC position. Further, he was a successful Chairman of the Democratic Governors Association when he was the Gov of Vermont.
I think Howard Dean will do a great job as DNC. But the overall situation points out that the Dems really can't do much worse than they have over the last six years (dating to the '98 midterm elections) and trends show they're likely to make gains in the future.
The not-so-secret secret is that the Democrats are about as down right now as it is possible for them to be. They've already been nearly knocked out of the South (outside of highly urban areas) and redistricting in places like
Now the good news: immigration patterns, demographics, and population growth foretell Democratic success in the future, not failure.
In presidential politics, the GOP may hold a nearly unbreakable base in the Mountain West and South at the moment, but the Dems have a solidifying blue hold on the Northeast, West coast, and important states like
Add to that recent Democratic victories in bright red states such as
A tiny shift in voting in the Southwest -- say, if
3 comments:
Please elaborate on the shooting in the foot. And how would passing SS reform help?
Who's your bet for competent bubba? Edwards, Mark Warner of Virginia, Wes Clark?
I think it will take a major hit to people's pocket books to really take a toll on the GOP's '06 and '08 chances. People just don't care about deficits right now. Howard Dean is brilliant in saying that the Democrats are the party of balanced budgets. I hope that it will bite at some point, but I'm skeptical.
You've mentioned that Edwards will allow the Dems to do "fine." But do you think he can capture the nomination? There will be a number of heavyweights and up-and-comers going after it in '08, and Dems will be hungry to anoint a "sure" winner.
My bet's on Clinton to capture the nomination (thought it's ridiculously early still).
Certainly Clinton's at the top of the list. She's already making a strong move to capture the "center." Hers will be a strong DLC-model move based upon her husband's success. With Bill in her corner, I can't believe that her critics aren't taking her more seriously to go all the way.
Who else? Kerry, if he decides to run again, will be a force, though how big is very hard to say. He could help to play king (or queen) maker, however.
Finally, Bill Richardson may be formidable. The Southwest (and Latino) vote will both be important battlegrounds. I believe the most fertile territory for Dems to "flip" blue is in the Southwest (Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico) and Richardson would be the perfect candidate to lead that charge. He's got an incredible resume, with only a questionable period as Sec of Energy (I believe) that the GOP will of course use to let the dogs out on.
Post a Comment